Not long after my
grandparents’, Rose Stroesser and Jack Hoyt’s, marriage
they moved from the midst of their families in the Omaha,
Nebraska/Council Bluffs, Iowa area halfway across the country to
Oregon. Therefore, they raised their children with the knowledge of a
multitude of cousins, aunts, uncles, and grandparents, but with
little actual contact with that extended family.
So when we learned
that a Stroesser cousin was coming to visit and wanted to meet her
Hoyt cousins, we (Rose and Jack’s children and grandchildren)
swooped down upon her, voracious for kinship. I was present for an
evening’s potluck with the family, during which our “new”
cousin posed the question: “Did you ever hear that Grandma was
supposed to ride on the Titanic?”
The Titanic at the docks See page for author [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons |
We
all eagerly assented to our having heard that rumor before. And that
set me on a course of thought which finally led to a breakthrough.
Every
seasoned genealogist has heard that well-known rumor of an ancestor
who was supposed to ride the Titanic
but luckily didn’t—and we have all been taught to scoff at such
wishful oral history. But oral history quite often contains a kernel
of truth, and the trick is to tease that truth out into the open.
Quite some time ago I believed I had discovered the truth of my
family’s Titanic story:
I found a ship’s passenger list containing two people who appeared
to be my great-grandmother Mary Craig and her father John Craig.
And how did this tie to the Titanic?
The ship they were riding on was the Mauretania,
which turned out to be the sister ship of the Lusitania.
If you recall high school history class, you may remember that the
sinking of the Lusitania
was an
impetus for the U.S. becoming involved in World War I. And if you
have any understanding of human nature, you can easily see how one
famous sunken ship could become confused with another when retelling
an imperfectly remembered tale.
The Mauretania and the Lusitania passing one another By UnknownAquitania at en.wikipedia [Public domain], from Wikimedia Commons |
You
will notice I said “I believed I
had discovered” and “who appeared to be my
great-grandmother.” I had not been able to prove to myself that the
John and Mary Craig on the passenger list were my John and Mary
Craig. The evidence on the list inclined me to think that they
probably were, but there just wasn’t enough information to be sure.
But I had long ago laid this question aside to focus on other
research objectives, and filed away my conclusions as an interesting
sidenote.
However,
this turned out to be a very opportune time to return my thoughts to
the passenger list. My experience with the 1907 passenger list of
Nicholas Stroesser revealing my great-grandfather’s pre-Omaha residence was still fairly fresh in my mind, and it struck
me that perhaps like that manifest the Mauretania’s had
a second page. I returned to the image on Ancestry to check. Sure
enough, it had. And it contained not only the certainty I was
seeking, but another much-needed piece of John Craig’s puzzle.
And
now, before I address the aforementioned much-needed piece of the
puzzle, I need to back up a little. John Craig is, of course, my
great-great-grandfather who was an unsolved murder in Omaha. My knowledge of his life is scanty despite a number of
sources: apart from those articles I have already shared
concerning his death, I had some other articles (which I will
undoubtedly share sometime, for they paint a portrait of a very...
ornery man), some city directories, a couple censuses, and a marriage
record.
However,
he seemed to have fallen out of the sky to marry Martha Robbenult,
because I had been utterly unable to confirm any record prior to
that. Although the marriage
record conveniently identified his parents and said he was born in
Scotland, try looking for a James and Margaret Craig with their son
John in Scotland! And then expand the search to all of England as
well, because some sources give his birthplace as England. Even
narrowing it down to only those of the right age, there are far too
many to choose from. I needed more information.
But
there, on the second page of the portion of the Mauretania’s
manifest applying to John Craig,
was a birthplace listed. The first one I had ever seen that specified
not only the country of his birth, but the town as well: Whitehaven,
England.
The Old Quay at Whitehaven Humphrey Bolton [CC BY-SA 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons |
So
naturally the first thing I did was to google Whitehaven. I learned
that it is situated in the county of Cumberland, in the far north of
England, bordering Scotland. That geographical location could explain
why John Craig is sometimes described as Scottish. The next thing I
did was to plug this new information into what I already knew about
John Craig and search for a census record. The result was almost
immediate: a household popped up in the 1881 census, and I read the
list of names. There were James and Margaret—the former born in
Ireland, the latter in Scotland—there was John himself, slightly
older than expected but in the right range and born in Whitehaven. As
my eye ran farther down the list chills ran up my spine. The next two
names were Matthew and Mary, siblings here but familiar to me as the
names of two of John’s own children. Perhaps these were those
children’s namesakes.
I
was able to locate this family in three other census years as well.
Although I haven’t found the proverbial smoking gun to confirm
beyond a doubt that these are indeed my 3great-grandparents, all the
evidence thus far tends to support that conclusion. (When I find
evidence that this Margaret’s maiden name is Mury or Murray I will
finally rest easy.) In a future post I will lay out all the evidence
in detail, but this post is already long enough.
Sources:
1861
census of England, Cumberland, Whitehaven registration district,
Egremont ecclesiastical district, Egremont parish, folio 73, page
30-31, Household of James Craig; digital images, Ancestry, Ancestry
(www.ancestry.com
: accessed 25 Apr 2015); citing PRO RG 9/3952.
1871
census of England, Cumberland, Egremont civil parish, folio 66, page
8-9, Household of Janes Crag; digital images, Ancestry, Ancestry
(www.ancestry.com
: accessed 25 Apr 2015); citing PRO RG 10/5262.
1881
census of England, Cumberland, Cleator Moor, civil parish of Cleator,
folio 117, page 48, Household of James Craig; digital images,
Ancestry, Ancestry
(www.ancestry.com
: accessed 25 Apr 2015); citing PRO RG 11/5191.
1891
census of England, Cumberland, Cleator Moor, civil parish of Cleator,
Egremont parliamentary division, ecclesiastical parish of St. Johns,
folio 91, page 19, Household of James Craig; digital images,
Ancestry, Ancestry
(www.ancestry.com
: accessed 25 Apr 2015); citing PRO RG 12/4317.
FamilySearch,
“Iowa, County Marriages, 1838-1934,” database, FamilySearch
(www.familysearch.org
: accessed 5 May 2013), entry for John Stephen Craig and M. M.Robbenult’s 1886 marriage; citing Crawford, Iowa, United States,
county courthouses, Iowa; Reference ID: p 60, GS Film Number:
1035129, Digital Folder Number: 004311125.
“New
York, Passenger Lists, 1820-1957,” online images, Ancestry
(www.ancestry.com
: accessed 14 Feb 2010), manifest, S.S.
Mauretania,
10 Mar 1911, list 6, lines 18-19, John Craig and Mary Craig; citing
Passenger
and Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New York, New York, 1897-1957,
Microfilm Publication M237, 675 rolls; Records of the U.S. Customs
Service, Record Group 36; National Archives at Washington, D.C;
Microfilm Roll: Roll 1637; Line: 19; Page Number: 68.